The Legitimacy of Welfare a Sociological Analysis of Motives for Contributing to Welfare Schemes
ثبت نشده
چکیده
Theoretically deduced concern about a declining legitimacy of the welfare state has been expressed regularly over the last thirty years. However, in that period empirical studies have repeatedly shown a permanent and substantial popular support for welfare. This mismatch might be due to two factors. Firstly, an inadequate understanding of people's motivations to support welfare, since the prognostic theories tend to overemphasise either an interest-base for such motivations, or a value-base, thereby neglecting the possibility that people might be motivated in both ways, at the same time, and that possibly other types of motivation might play a role too. Secondly, thus far people's motivations to contribute to welfare have been measured indirectly only, which cab easily lead to false conclusions. A direct measurement would allow for more accurate conclusions, as well as more adequate analyses of the structural and cultural determinants of motivations, which is an area largely uncovered at present. In this article an empirical instrument is developed and applied for measuring directly the various motivations people may have to contribute to welfare. For this purpose different types of motivation are deduced from sociological theories on solidarity, which address the general question why individual people would give priority to collective over personal interests. Four motives are found: perceived self-interest, moral obligation, affection and identification with others, and accepted authority. The core of the measurement instrument consists of asking respondents to what degree the first three motives for contributing to social security apply in their case, given that paying such contributions is a legal obligation. The instrument is applied in a national survey among the Dutch adult population in 1995. The main conclusions are: that indeed a large majority of the Dutch is motivated to pay for welfare on several grounds at the time; that the motive of self-interest plays a most important role; that older people, men and the highest educated are more strongly motivated to contribute to welfare, while welfare use and income level only have a modest influence; and that the main patterns can be understood from the encompassing character of the Dutch welfare state, from which (nearly) all Dutch citizens profit personally.
منابع مشابه
Why Pay for Social Security ?
With regard to the legitimacy of welfare empirical evidence tends to defy pessimistic theories. Here this puzzling contradiction between facts and theory is seen as a result of insufficient understanding of people's motivations to support welfare. For improving such understanding an empirical instrument is developed and applied for measuring directly the various motivations people may have to p...
متن کاملHumpty Dumpty domination on correlational data analysis in social welfare researches
Introduction Identifying and correct errors is essential to science, so propose the maxim that science is self correcting. While the err is humain is accepted reflected in philosophy of science especially in giving rise to the maxim that scientific hypothesis must have the chance to falsify. In the current paper, the author point to errors in correlational studies, that occure because of misus...
متن کاملHumpty Dumpty domination on correlational data analysis in social welfare researches
Introduction Identifying and correct errors is essential to science, so propose the maxim that science is self correcting. While the err is humain is accepted reflected in philosophy of science especially in giving rise to the maxim that scientific hypothesis must have the chance to falsify. In the current paper, the author point to errors in correlational studies, that occure because of misus...
متن کاملPig in the middle: farmers and the delivery of farm animal welfare standards
Purpose This paper examines the attitude of UK pig farmers to the delivery of improved farm animal welfare standards and investigates how they contribute to this objective through their membership of a range of different farm assurance schemes. Design/methodology/approach The analysis focuses on three main groups of pig farmers: (i) farmers engaged in conventional farm assurance schemes; (ii) f...
متن کاملA Prototype Tool to Enable Farmers to Measure and Improve the Welfare Performance of the Farm Animal Enterprise: The Unified Field Index
Schemes for the assessment of farm animal welfare and assurance of welfare standards have proliferated in recent years. An acknowledged short-coming has been the lack of impact of these schemes on the welfare standards achieved on farm due in part to sociological factors concerning their implementation. Here we propose the concept of welfare performance based on a broad set of performance attri...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1999